Oggetto: ancora sull'iran
Data: 13/3/2006 17.57.10
Visite: 135
Da Internet, da siti e da blog NON ufficiali, (la qual cosa mi fa riflettere sul dualismo informazione vera-falsa), raccolgo in modo sparso alcune informazioni riguardo l’IRAN, dalle quali invito a prendere o le dovute distanze riguardo la veridicità oppure le dovute riflessioni in merito.
1) Documento americano datato 29 luglio 1998, dal titolo :
"Russian Missile Technology and
Nuclear Reactor Transfers to Iran" di :
Stuart D. Goldman
Specialist in Russian Affairs
Kenneth Katzman
Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
Robert D. Shuey
Specialist in U.S. Foreign Policy
Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division
Carl E. Behrens
Specialist in Energy Policy
Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division
Updated July 29, 1998
29 pagine nelle quali si parla di sviluppo (da parte dell’IRAN) di missili "Shahab" MRBM ovvero balistici con medio raggio (1001 –3000 Km) .
Ne copio parte del testo :
[….]
On February 6, 1997, Vice President Gore issued a diplomatic warning to then-Premier Chernomyrdin regarding Russian transfers to Iran of parts and technology associated with SS-4 medium-range ballistic missiles. Over the next several 8
months, press reports indicated that Russian enterprises provided Iran specialty steels
and alloys, tungsten coated graphite, wind tunnel facilities, gyroscopes and other guidance technology, rocket engine and fuel technology, laser equipment, machine tools, and maintenance manuals. U.S. and Israeli concerns have focused on Russian help in the development of two liquid-fuel, medium range missiles — the Shahab 3and the Shahab 4. (See table below.) Israeli and U.S. officials believe the Shahab missiles are further improvements on the North Korean Nodong, and, according to press reports, U.S. officials estimate Iran could deploy the Shahab 3 within a year or two, and could deploy the Shahab 4 within 3 years. One article cited a "classified
U.S. intelligence report" as predicting Iran would field prototypes of both missiles within 18 months. Analysts believe that the integration of a nuclear, biological, or chemical warhead, development of a sophisticated guidance system, and a system to
separate the warhead from the missile body will take Iran more than several months.
Israeli intelligence also reported the development of two other unnamed Iranian missiles with ranges of 5,500 km and 10,000 km (the latter is the distance from Iran to Alaska or to the northeastern portion of the United States). A report from a 9 congressionally-mandated commission headed by former Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld, released in July 1998, estimated that Iran could demonstrate an ICBM similar to North Korea's Taepo Dong 2 (up to 10,000 km range) within five years of a decision to proceed. In addition, the report said Iran is seeking and has acquired
components that can be combined to produce missiles capable of reaching the United States.
[……]
Fa poi seguito una tabella che riassume gli sviluppi della missilistica iraniana nei successivi anni del 98.
In particolare lo sviluppo si concentra su :
4 tipologie di missili MRBM ( a medio raggio da 1300 a 200 km di gittata)
2 tipologie di missili SRBM (a piccolo raggio da 100 a 300 km)
1 programma non definito per la realizzazione di missili ICBM a gittata fino a 12000 km.
2) Lancio del primo satellite iraniano "SINA" 27 ottobre 2005 dalla base di Plesetek in Russia.Tale satellite dovrebbe (?) forse (?) essere impiegato per riprendere le immagini dell’Iran e calamità naturali. Ma potrebbe contenere anche il sistema di guida (?) dei missili.
3) NOTIZIA (da controllarne la veridicità!!) la portaerei americana Reagan armata con missili Tomahawak nelle acque del Golfo Persico 8 marzo 2006.
4) Mappa dei siti iraniani di estrazione, produzione, arricchimento e ricerca dell’uranio, bersagli (pare) di prossimi massicci bombardamenti.
Insomma a quanto sembrerebbe ci sarebbero le intenzioni (?) di un attacco.
maniata ad una zizza appesa...
