Oggetto: Qual è migliore? (inglese)
Data: 21/2/2008 13.19.30
Visite: 311
ciao cari/e,
mi servirebbe la vostra opinione, se masticate un pò l'inglese.
ordunque:
questi sono due brevi stralci di un articolo in inglese, che dicono più o meno la stessa cosa.
secondo voi, in quale dei due si esprime meglio il concetto, qual è scritto meglio, insomma?
rispondete, orsù, per me è importante
Il primo:
"In the last years, the consumption of bottled water in Italy has increased enormously, leading to an increasing average charge for the families and for the commercial stores.
Nevertheless, bottled water is rarely completely free of microorganisms. Natural mineral water is not sterilized, pasteurized or otherwise treated to remove or destroy microorganisms. The number of the bacteria recovered at the source is generally very low but there are many reports that viable counts increase, notably in still water after 1-3 weeks of storage (Bharath J., 2003). Relating the water quality to the degree of bacterial contamination, concerns have been raised about its microbial quality and standards have been established to protect the public from waterborne disease outbreaks."
Il secondo:
"It is well known that water quality is an important aspect of human health, because contaminated water has been frequently described as the vehicle of infectious diseases that can cause morbidity and mortality in the population. Over the past decade, there has been a markedly increase worldwide in the consumption of water derived from different spurces in place of tap water for drinking use. One of these alternative sources is the water from dispensers, which is popular mainky in office buildings and commercial stores."
"Chi non s'aspetta l'inaspettato non scoprirà mai la verità" - Eraclito
